Saturday, 22 March 2014

Post colonial theory

Name: Goswami Gayatri Mahipatgiri
Paper: 5, MA –part -1-SEM -2
Topic: post colonial theory
Submitted to: department of English, maharaja Krishna kumarsingji Bhavnagar University 
*        Colonialism :
                            The imperialist Expansion of Europe into the rest of the  world during the last four hundred years in which a dominant   imperium or center carried on a Relation .ship of central and influence aver its margins or colonies .this relation tended to extend to social , pedologagical ,economic ,political, and broadly culturally exchanges often with a hierarchical European setter class and local ,educated elite class forming layers between the European “mother nation and the various indigenous people who were controlled such a system carried within it in inherent nations of racial inferiority and exotic athemess.

*  Post-colonialism:
                             Broadly a study of the effects of colonialism on cultures and societies it is concerned with both how European nation conquered and controlled “third world” cultures and haw these groups have since responded to and resisted those encroachments .post-colonialism, as both a body of theory  and a study of political and cultural changes , as gene and continues to go through three broad stag
                                                                                                                               
1.   An initial awareness of the social, psychological, and cultural inferiority enforced by being in a colonized state.
2.  The struggle for ethnic, cultural and political autonomy.
3.  A growing awareness of cultural overlap and hybridist.

*      Post-colonial is an academic discipline featuring methods of intellectual discourse that analyzed ,explain ,and respond to the cultural legacies of  colonialism and of imperialism , to the human consequences of country and establishing settlers for the economic exploitation of the native people and their land .drawing from post modern school of  thought ,post- colonialism question and reinvents modes of cultural perception , the way of viewing and of being viewed .As Anthropology  , post- colonialism Records human relation among the colonial nation and the “subaltern”  peoples exploited by colonial rule .as critical theory ,post-colonial present , explain and illustrates the ideology and the praxis of neo- colonialism ,with example drawn from the  humanities history and political science, philosophy and Marxist theory , sociology anthropology ,and human geography  ;the cinema  , linguistics and post-colonial literature , of in which the antic – conquest narrative genre present the stories of colonial subjection of the subaltern man and women
  
*        Colonialism was presented as “the extension of civilization “       which ideological justified the self –ascribed superiority of the non- western world which josepherest rename espoused in do reformed  intellectual moral , where by imperial stewardship would affect the intellectual moral reformation of the colored people of the  lesser cultures of the world.

*   Post -colonial theory :
“A theory on end dons for life after foreign rule”
.
The obvious implication of the term post-colonial is that Is refers to a period coming after the end of colonialism, such a commonsense understanding has much to commend it   , but that sense   of an ending of the completion of one period of history and the emergence of another   , is as we shall see , hard to maintain in any simple or unproblematic fashion on the era of the great European colonial empires is over ,and that in itself is a fact of major significance
                              The Anglo-Irish novelist j.G.farrell, a post-colonial chronicler of the British Empire’s moment of crises and certainly chronicler of the on supporter of the system, nevertheless singled out the decline and dissolution of the empire as the important event of his lifetime.

*                        The dismantling of structures of colonial control, beginning in Ernest in the late 1950s constituted a remarkable historical moment, as country after country gained independence from the colonizing power.

*    An introduction to post – colonial theory:
         
         Sense in wich a colonizing power may itself have once been a colony is one of the starting-point for Joseph Conrad’s heart of darkness. I have seen articles in a great many places,In the special issue of social text on postcoloniality, which push the use of the term colonialism back to such a configuration as the Incas ,the Ottomans and the Chinese, well before the Europeans colonial empires began :and than bring the term forward to cover all kind of national oppressions; as ,for example , the savagery of the Indonesian government in east timer. “Colonialism” they becomes a trans-historical thing, always present and always in process of dissolution in one pert of the world or another.      

*    A major contention in post-colonial studies:

                         Post-colonial studies is that the overlapping development of the ensemble of European colonial empires, British, French, Duch, Spanish, Portuguese, Belgium, German- from the sixteenth century onwards, and their dismantling in the second half of the twentieth century .the critical analysis of the history, culture, literature, and modes of discourse that are specific to the former colonies of England, spain, france, and other European imperial powers.

*    Use in term “post-colonial”:-
                   
          However, to cover all the culture effected by the imperial process from the moment of colonialism to the present day .

*    Definition of the “post-colonial”:
             
                  Of course vary wildly ,but for me the concept proves most useful not when it is used synonymously with a post –independence historical period in once –colonized nation ,but rather when it locates a specifically anti or post colonial discursive purchase in culture, one wich begins in the moment that colonial power inscribes itself into the body and space of its others and wich naptimes .


Key Terms in Post-Colonial Theory

*  Colonialism:
                                  The imperialist expansion of Europe into the rest of the world during the last four hundred years in which a dominant emporium or center carried on a relationship of control and influence over its margins or colonies. This relationship tended to extend to social, pedagogical, economic, political, and broadly culturally exchanges often with a hierarchical European settler class and local, educated (compactor) elite class forming layers between the European "mother" nation and the various indigenous peoples who were controlled. Such a system carried within it inherent notions of racial inferiority and exotic otherness.
*  post-colonialism:



 Broadly a study of the effects of colonialism on cultures and societies. It is concerned with both how European nations conquered and controlled "Third World" cultures and how these groups have since responded to and resisted those encroachments. Post-colonialism, as both a body of theory and a study of political and cultural change, has gone and continues to go through three broad stages:
1.     an initial awareness of the social, psychological, and cultural inferiority enforced by being in a colonized state
2.     the struggle for ethnic, cultural, and political autonomy
3.     a growing awareness of cultural overlap and hybridity

*   ambivalence:


 the ambiguous way in which colonizer and colonized regard one another.  The colonizer often regards the colonized as both inferior yet exotically other, while the colonized regards the colonizer as both enviable yet corrupt.  In a context of hybridity, this often produces a mixed sense of blessing and curse.


*    Alterity: 


"the state of being other or different"; the political, cultural, linguistic, or religious other. The study of the ways in which one group makes themselves different from others.

*    education:
                            the process by which a colonizing power assimilates either    a subaltern native elite colonial or a larger population to its way of thinking and seeing the world.
*    Diaspora:            

the voluntary or enforced migration of peoples from their native homelands.  Diaspora literature is often concerned with questions of maintaining or altering identity, language, and culture while  in another culture or country.


*    essentialism

the essence or "whiteness" of something.  In the context of race, ethnicity, or culture, essentialism suggests the practice of various groups deciding what is and isn't a particular identity.  As a practice, essentialism tends to overlook differences within groups often to maintain the status quo or obtain power.  Essentialist claims can be used by a colonizing power but also by the colonized as a way of resisting what is claimed about them.


*    ethnicity:

a fusion of traits that belong to a group–shared values, beliefs, norms, tastes, behaviors, experiences, memories, and loyalties. Often deeply related to a person’s identity.


*    exoticism

the process by which a cultural practice is made stimulating and exciting in its difference from the colonializer’s normal perspective. Ironically, as European groups educated local, indigenous cultures, schoolchildren often began to see their native lifeways, plants, and animals as exotic and the European counterparts as "normal" or "typical."


*    hegemony

the power of the ruling class to convince other classes that their interests are the interests of all, often not only through means of economic and political control but more subtly through the control of education and media

.
*    Hybridity:

*    new transcultural forms that arise from cross-cultural exchange. Hybridity can be social, political, linguistic, religious, etc. It is not necessarily a peaceful mixture, for it can be contentious and disruptive in its experience.  Note the two related definitions:
*    catalysis: the (specifically New World) experience of several ethnic groups interacting and mixing with each other often in a contentious environment that gives way to new forms of identity and experience.
*    creolization: societies that arise from a mixture of ethnic and racial nixing to form a new material, psychological, and spiritual self-definition.

*    identity: 

the way in which an individual and/or group defines itself. Identity is important to self-concept, social mores, and national understanding.   It often involves both essentialism and othering.


*    ideology: 

"a system of values, beliefs, or ideas shared by some social group and often taken for granted as natural or inherently true" (Bordwell & Thompson 494)


*    language:

In the context of colonialism and post-colonialism, language has often become a site for both colonization and resistance. In particular, a return to the original indigenous language is often advocated since the language was suppressed by colonizing forces.  The use of European languages is a much debated issue among postcolonial authors.
abrogation: a refusal to use the language of the colonizer in a correct or standard way.

appropriation: "the process by which the language is made to 'bear the burden' of one's own cultural experience."

*    magical realism:

the adaptation of Western realist methods of literature in describing the imaginary life of indigenous cultures who experience the mythical, magical, and supernatural in a decidedly different fashion from Western ones. A weaving together elements we tend to associate with European realism and elements we associate with the fabulous, where these two worlds undergo a "closeness or near merging."


*    mapping: 

the mapping of global space in the context of colonialism was as much prescriptive as it was descriptive.  Maps were used to assist in the process of aggression, and they were also used to establish claims.  Maps claims the boundaries of a nation, for example.


*    metanarrative:

("grand narratives," "master narratives.") a large cultural story that seeks to explain within its borders all the little, local narratives.  A metanarrative claims to be a big truth concerning the world and the way it works.  Some charge that all metanarratives are inherently oppressive because they decide whether other narratives are allowed or not.



*    mimicry:


the means by which the colonized adapt the culture (language, education, clothing, etc.) of the colonizer but always in the process changing it in important ways.  Such an approach always contains it in the ambivalence of hybridist.


*    nation/nation-state:

an aggregation of people organized under a single government. National interest is associated both with a struggle for independent ethnic and cultural identity, and ironically an opposite belief in universal rights, often multicultural, with a basis in geo-economic interests. Thus, the move for national independence is just as often associated with region as it is with ethnicity or culture, and the two are often at odds when new nations are formed.


*    oirientalism:

the process (from the late eighteenth century to the present) by which "the Orient" was constructed as an exotic other by European studies and culture. Orientalism is not so much a true study of other cultures as it is broad Western generalization about Oriental, Islamic, and/or Asian cultures that tends to erode and ignore their substantial differences.
*    other

the social and/or psychological ways in which one group excludes or marginalizes another group. By declaring someone "Other," persons tend to stress what makes them dissimilar from or opposite of another, and this carries over into the way they represent others, especially through stereotypical images.

*    race

the division and classification of human beings by physical and biological characteristics.  Race often is used by various groups to either maintain power or to stress solidarity. In the 18th and19th centuries, it was often used as a pretext by European colonial powers for slavery and/or the "white man's burden."
*    semiotics:

a system of signs which one knows what something is. Cultural semiotics often provide the means by which a group defines itself or by which a colonial zing power attempts to control and assimilate another group.


*    space/place:

space represents a geographic locale, one empty in not being designated. Place, on the other hand, is what happens when a space is made or owned.  Place involves landscape, language, environment, culture, etc.

*    subaltern:

 the lower or colonized classes who have little access to their own means of expression and are thus dependent upon the language and methods of the ruling class to express themselves.
*   wording:

 the process by which a person, family, culture, or people is brought into the dominant Eurocentric/Western global society.





Northrop Frye:" Arhetypal ctriticism "

Assignment topic: Northopfrye’s Archetypal Criticism
Name: Goswami Gayatri Mahipatgiri
Roll no.:09
M.A. Semester – 2
Paper no.:7 literary theory and criticism
Submitted to: Department of English
Smt. S. B. Gardi
Maharaja Krishnakumar sinhji Bhavnagar University












Introduction: Northrop Frye
Harman Northrop Frye was a Canadian literary critic and literary theorist, considered one of the most influential of the 20th century. Frye gained international fame with his first book, Fearful Symnely, which led to the reinterpretation of the poetry of William Blake. His lasting reputation rests principally on the theory of literary criticism that he developed in Anatomy of Criticism, one of the most important work of literary theory publish in the 20th century.
Archetypal literary criticism:
Term comes from “Arch” both and adjective and a prefix, and “Type” noun “arch” as an adjective means literary “chief” or “principal”. As a prefix, it refers to “highest” or “most important” consider word like “Archangel” or “Archbishop”. “Type” from the Latin “Typus” means as “image” or “impression”. It refers to general character train or structure commonly had in a certain group or class; it is an embodiment of or a example, a mode with ideal features. A type may be figure, representation, or a symbol of something to come, consider work like “typical” or “typify” and a shadow.
Be a narrow definition and an archetype is an original mode or type after which similar things are patterned; a prototype; and an ideal example.
Archetypal literary criticism is most famous theory written by Northrop Frye. Archetypal literary that interprets a text by focusing on recurring myths and Archetypal in the narrative symbols, image, and character types in literary work. As a form of literary criticism, it dates back to 1934 when mauled bodkin published Archetypal patterns poetry. Archetypal literary criticism origins to are rooted in two other academic disciplines, social Anthropology and psychoanalysis, each contributed to literary criticism in separate ways, with the latter being a sub-branch of critical theory. Archetypal criticism was at it most popular in the 1940s and 1950s largely due to the work of condition literary critic Northrop Frye. Though Archetypal literary criticism no longer widely did not practice nor have there been any major developments in the field, it still has a place in the tradition of literary studies.
Archetypal criticism as “A new poetics”:
Archetypal  criticism as a most of a new poetic. Frye; this “new poetics” is to be found in the principal of the mythological framework, which has come to be known as “Archetypal criticism”. It is through the lens of this framework, which is essentially a centrifugal movement of backing up from the text the towards of literary criticism becomes apparent essentially, “what criticism can do” according to Frye, “is awaken students to successive levels of awareness of the mythology that lies behind the ideology in which their society in doctrinaires them”. The student is great and makes a great structure.
 That is, the study of recurring structure pasterns grants students an emancipation distance from their own society, and gives theme vision of a higher human state the logician sublime. That is not accessible directly through their own experience, but ultimately transforms and expands their experience, so that the poetic model he terms a “kerugmatik mode” , myths become “myth to live by” and metaphors “metaphors to live In ”which  not only   work for us but constantly expand our horizons , we may enter the world of and pass  on to others  what we have found to be  true for ourselves “.
As important antecedent of the literary theory of the Archetype.
Archetypal criticism was the treatment of myth by a group of computer.
Northrop Frye working in the field of literature defined Archetypes as a symbol, usually an image. Gerald gannet as the structuralist, no story perfectly match the archetype and some stories will diverse from the archetype more than the others.
Archetype can be:
·       Symbol
·       Image
·       Characters
·       Plot structures
They are revealed in:
·       Myth
·       Religions and folklore
·       Dream and fantasies
·       Literature, dream and film
Archetypal criticism is character type, story Lines, setting, and symbol. According to Jung, these a pattern are embedded deep in the “collective unconscious” and involve “racial memories” of situations. Event, relationship from time immemorial.  Northrop Frye’s book “The Anatomy of Criticism” views literature as an   “autonomous language” and words as a signs that contributed to the organizing structural pattern or “conceptualize myth” of which the work is one example.
Frye proposes for “Mythos” for major genre associated with the season of the year:
1.   Comedy – Spring
2.   Romance – Summer
3.   Satire and Irony  – Winter
4.   Autumn – Tragedy



Literary critics who subscribe to Jung’s Archetypal theory seek to identity. Archetypes and trace pattern in diverse literary work across eras and cultures. One of the most often trace Archetypal patterns is that of the quest by the protagonist, who must leave her home, travel into unfamiliar territories, meet a guide, endure dangerous  situations and adventures, rich the object of her quest, gain important new knowledge, and return home with that knowledge to share with the others.
Archetypal pattern and the tensed structural of the masterpiece and the vibrate in such way that a sympathetic reasons is set of deep within reader.
·      Comedy=spring :
Comedy is aligned with a spring because the genre of comedy as a characterized by the birth of the hero, revival and resurrection. Also spring symbolize the defeat of a winter and darkness.
·      Romance=summer:
Romance and summer are paired together because summer is the culmination of life in the seasonal calendar, and the Romance genre culminates with some sort of a triumph, usually a marriage.
·      Satire=winter:
Satire is a metonym zed with a winter on the grounds that a satire is a “dark genre”. Satire is a disillusion and mocking form of the three other genres. It is noted for it darkness, disillusion, the return of a chaos, and the defect of the heroic figure.
·      Autumn=tragedy:
Autumn is the dying stage of seasonal calendar, which parallel the tragedy genre because it is, known for the “fall”, or a demise of the protagonist.
The context of a genre determines and highlighted of the autumn is tragedy Shawn:
·      The world of human:
The comedic human world is representative of wish-fulfillment and being community centered. In contrast, the tragic human world is of isolation, tyranny, and the fallen hero.

Animals in the comedic genres are docile and pastoral, while animals are predatory and hunters in the tragic.
·      Realm of vegetation:
For the realm of vegetation, the comedic is, again, pastoral, but also represented by gardens, parks, roses and lotuses. As for the tragic, vegetation is of a wild forest, or as being barren.
Cities, temples, or precious stones represent the comedic mineral realm. The tragic mineral realm is noted for being a desert, ruins, or “of sinister geometrical images”

Lastly, the water realm is represented by rivers in the comedic. With the tragic, the seas, and especially floods, signify the water sphere.

Northrop Frye admits that his schema in “The Archetypes of Literature” is simplistic, but makes room for exception by noting that there are neutral archetypes. The example he cites are islands such as Circe’s or Prospero’s which cannot be categorized under the tragic or comedic.